{"product_id":"sinless-flesh-a-critique-of-karl-barths-fallen-christ-studies-in-historical-and-systematic-theology-series-567466","title":"Sinless Flesh: A Critique of Karl Barth's Fallen Christ (Studies In Historical And Systematic Theology Series)","description":"**Did Christ assume a fallen human nature?**  \u003cbr\u003e   \u003cbr\u003e \"What is not assumed is not healed.\" So goes the Chalcedonian maxim articulated by Gregory of Nazianzus regarding the nature and extent of Christ's work in assuming a human nature. But what is the nature of that assumption? If Christ is to stand in solidarity with us, must he have assumed not merely a human nature, but specifically a *fallen* human nature?  \u003cbr\u003e   \u003cbr\u003e In *Sinless Flesh*: *A Critique of Karl Barth's Fallen Christ*, Rafael Bello argues against the assertion made by Karl Barth, T. F. Torrance, and those who follow them that Christ assumed a fallen nature. Through retrieval of patristic, medieval, and Reformed orthodox theologians, Bello argues that a proper understanding of human nature, trinitarian inseparable operations, and the habitual grace-grace of union distinction leads to the conclusion that the assertion that Christ assumed a fallen human nature is at odds with faithful theological and historical understandings of the incarnation.  \u003cbr\u003e   \u003cbr\u003e Readers interested in theological retrieval for issues in contemporary theology will find a faithful model and way forward for a thorny issue in modern dogmatics.","brand":"Koorong","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":51572252016927,"sku":"9781683594055","price":49.99,"currency_code":"AUD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0925\/8981\/8143\/files\/9781683594055_1492919.jpg?v=1769385072","url":"https:\/\/koorong.com\/products\/sinless-flesh-a-critique-of-karl-barths-fallen-christ-studies-in-historical-and-systematic-theology-series-567466","provider":"Koorong","version":"1.0","type":"link"}