- Home /
- Academic /
- Apologetics /
- Jesus' Resu...
Jesus' Resurrection Fact Or Figment?
Paul Copan, Ronald K. Tacelli, William Lane Craig, Gerd LüdemannPaperback 2000-11-24
Publisher Description
In the view of many, the truth of Christianity hangs on the answer to these questions. * Was the resurrection of Jesus a fact of history or a figment of imagination? * Was it an event that entailed a raised and transformed body and an empty tomb? * Or was it a subjective, visionary experience--a collective delusion?
Jesus' Resurrection: Fact or Figment? is a lively and provocative debate between Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig and New Testament scholar and atheist Gerd Ludemann. This published version of a debate originally set at Boston College is edited by Paul Copan and Ronald K. Tacelli, who invite the responses of four additional scholars. Robert Gundry, a New Testament scholar, and Stephen Davis, a philosopher, argue in support of a historical and actual resurrection. Michael Goulder and Roy Hoover, both New Testament scholars, offer their support for Gerd Ludemann's view that the "resurrection" was based on the guilt-induced visionary experience of the disciples. The book concludes with a final response from Ludemann and Craig.
$84.99
$84.99
Available to order
Earn
reward points per item
Click & collect: Select your store
Get information on product availability in store.
You may also like
Publisher Description
In the view of many, the truth of Christianity hangs on the answer to these questions. * Was the resurrection of Jesus a fact of history or a figment of imagination? * Was it an event that entailed a raised and transformed body and an empty tomb? * Or was it a subjective, visionary experience--a collective delusion?
Jesus' Resurrection: Fact or Figment? is a lively and provocative debate between Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig and New Testament scholar and atheist Gerd Ludemann. This published version of a debate originally set at Boston College is edited by Paul Copan and Ronald K. Tacelli, who invite the responses of four additional scholars. Robert Gundry, a New Testament scholar, and Stephen Davis, a philosopher, argue in support of a historical and actual resurrection. Michael Goulder and Roy Hoover, both New Testament scholars, offer their support for Gerd Ludemann's view that the "resurrection" was based on the guilt-induced visionary experience of the disciples. The book concludes with a final response from Ludemann and Craig.