- Home /
- Academic /
- Biblical Studies /
- Paul /
- Revisiting ...
Revisiting Paul's Doctrine of Justification: A Challenge to the New Perspective
Peter StuhlmacherPaperback 2001-10-20
Since 1963, scholars like Krister Stendahl, E P Sanders and James Dunn have raised objections against the traditional view of the Pauline doctrine of justification. Stuhlmacher mounts a forthright challenge based on established and more recent scholarship. In particular he argues that the forensic and mystical elements of Paul's doctrine of justification should not be played off against one another. 108 pages, from IVP.
Publisher Description
Since 1963, substantial objections have been raised against the traditional view of the Pauline doctrine of justification, mainly by New Testament scholars such as Krister Stendahl, E. P. Sanders and James D. G. Dunn. This book evaluates the "New Perspective on Paul" and finds it wanting.With appreciation for the important critique already offered by Donald Hagner, which is included in this volume, Peter Stuhlmacher mounts a forthright and well-supported challenge based on established and more recent scholarship concerning Paul's understanding of justification. In particular he argues that the forensic and mystical elements of Paul's doctrine of justification should not be played off against one another. Rather Paul's understanding can be faithfully rendered only within the context of his apostolic mission to Jews and Gentiles and the expectation of the coming kingdom of God.This book will be of interest to students and teachers of biblical studies, biblical theology and systematic theology, and to those engaged in Jewish-Christian dialogue, Protestant-Roman Catholic conversation about the doctrine of justification, or discussions of rival views of justification within Protestantism.
$32.99
$32.99
Available to order
Earn 32 reward points per item
Click & collect: Select your store
Get information on product availability in store.
You may also like
Since 1963, scholars like Krister Stendahl, E P Sanders and James Dunn have raised objections against the traditional view of the Pauline doctrine of justification. Stuhlmacher mounts a forthright challenge based on established and more recent scholarship. In particular he argues that the forensic and mystical elements of Paul's doctrine of justification should not be played off against one another. 108 pages, from IVP.
Publisher Description
Since 1963, substantial objections have been raised against the traditional view of the Pauline doctrine of justification, mainly by New Testament scholars such as Krister Stendahl, E. P. Sanders and James D. G. Dunn. This book evaluates the "New Perspective on Paul" and finds it wanting.With appreciation for the important critique already offered by Donald Hagner, which is included in this volume, Peter Stuhlmacher mounts a forthright and well-supported challenge based on established and more recent scholarship concerning Paul's understanding of justification. In particular he argues that the forensic and mystical elements of Paul's doctrine of justification should not be played off against one another. Rather Paul's understanding can be faithfully rendered only within the context of his apostolic mission to Jews and Gentiles and the expectation of the coming kingdom of God.This book will be of interest to students and teachers of biblical studies, biblical theology and systematic theology, and to those engaged in Jewish-Christian dialogue, Protestant-Roman Catholic conversation about the doctrine of justification, or discussions of rival views of justification within Protestantism.