Does the Bible support the concept of "once saved, always saved," or can a person lose his or her salvation? In this book, four writers explain and defend their approaches to perseverance in salvation from the vantagepoint of Classical Calvinism, Moderate Calvinism, Reformed Arminianism, and Wesleyan-Arminianism. Each writer responds to...
Does the Bible support the concept of "once saved, always saved," or can a person lose his or her salvation? In this book, four writers explain and defend their approaches to perseverance in salvation from the vantagepoint of Classical Calvinism, Moderate Calvinism, Reformed Arminianism, and Wesleyan-Arminianism. Each writer responds to the other views. 304 pages, from Zondervan.
Does the Bible support the concept of once saved, always saved, or can a person lose his or her salvation? How do the Scriptures portray the complex interplay between grace and free will? These and related questions are explored from different angles in this thought-provoking Counterpoints volume.;The contributors each state their case for one of four prominent views on eternal security\* classical Calvinist, moderate Calvinist, reformed Armenian, and Wesleyan Armenian. In keeping with the forum approach of the Counterpoints series, each view is first presented by its proponent, then critiqued and defended. This fair and respectful approach allows you to weigh for yourself the strengths and weaknesses of the different doctrinal stances. By furnishing you with scholarly and thoughtful perspectives on the topic of eternal security, this book helps you sift through opposing views to arrive at your own informed conclusions.
$36.99
or 4 interest-free payments of $9.25 with
Order today for it to arrive in 6-8 weeks
Note: This item is a backorder. Purchase now and we’ll notify you when it’s ready for delivery or pick-up.
Does the Bible support the concept of "once saved, always saved," or can a person lose his or her salvation? In this book, four writers explain and defend their approaches to perseverance in salvation from the vantagepoint of Classical Calvinism, Moderate Calvinism, Reformed Arminianism, and Wesleyan-Arminianism. Each writer responds to...
Does the Bible support the concept of "once saved, always saved," or can a person lose his or her salvation? In this book, four writers explain and defend their approaches to perseverance in salvation from the vantagepoint of Classical Calvinism, Moderate Calvinism, Reformed Arminianism, and Wesleyan-Arminianism. Each writer responds to the other views. 304 pages, from Zondervan.
Does the Bible support the concept of once saved, always saved, or can a person lose his or her salvation? How do the Scriptures portray the complex interplay between grace and free will? These and related questions are explored from different angles in this thought-provoking Counterpoints volume.;The contributors each state their case for one of four prominent views on eternal security\* classical Calvinist, moderate Calvinist, reformed Armenian, and Wesleyan Armenian. In keeping with the forum approach of the Counterpoints series, each view is first presented by its proponent, then critiqued and defended. This fair and respectful approach allows you to weigh for yourself the strengths and weaknesses of the different doctrinal stances. By furnishing you with scholarly and thoughtful perspectives on the topic of eternal security, this book helps you sift through opposing views to arrive at your own informed conclusions.
Four Views on Eternal Security (Counterpoints Series)$36.99
Koorong code176692
ISBN9780310234395
Pages304
PublisherZondervan
Publication date01 May 2002
Dimensions20 x 135 x 205mm
Weight0.267kg
5.0
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars
1 Review
DeliveryOrder today for it to arrive in 6-8 weeks
Returns
Enjoy peace of mind with our 60-day hassle-free returns, whether you shop online or in store.
(mostly) faithful representations of the major positions
For the most part, this book seems to achieve the main aim of the Counterpoints series: its four essays are (mostly) representative of some of the major positions in the debate over eternal security. Horton's essay represents the classical Calvinist position succinctly but without loss of accuracy. Harper examines the writings of Wesley to explicate the Wesleyan view and situate it within its historical-theological context. Geisler and Ashby both hold intermediate views: Geisler argues for what he calls a 'moderate Calvinist' position (though perhaps classical Calvinists would distance themselves more from the view here represented, as Horton does); Ashby explicates the Arminian view and argues for the (perhaps surprising) claim that Arminius largely agreed with the Reformed position. Another strength of this book is that it shows the connection between the issue in the title with other soteriological questions.
