Overturning a popular view of the atonement Was Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulén's *Christus Victor* view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a ransom paid to the powers of evil and which, according to Aulén, reflected the beliefs of...
Overturning a popular view of the atonement Was Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulén's *Christus Victor* view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a ransom paid to the powers of evil and which, according to Aulén, reflected the beliefs of the early church. Aulén held that this ransom theory view dominated until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution. In *Suffering, Not Power,* Benjamin Wheaton challenges this common narrative that Christ's work of atonement was reframed by Anselm, showing that sacrificial and substitutionary language was common well before Anselm's *Cur Deus Homo*. Wheaton displays this through a careful analysis of three medieval theologians whose writings on the atonement are commonly overlooked: Caesarius of Arles, Haimo of Auxerre, and Dante Alighieri. These figures come from different times and contexts and wrote in different genres, but each spoke of Christ's death as a sacrifice of expiation and propitiation made by God to God. Let history speak for itself, read the evidence, and reconsider the church's belief in Christ's substitutionary death for sinners.
$49.99
or 4 interest-free payments of $12.50 with
Order today for it to arrive in 6-8 weeks
Note: This item is a backorder. Purchase now and we’ll notify you when it’s ready for delivery or pick-up.
Overturning a popular view of the atonement Was Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulén's *Christus Victor* view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a ransom paid to the powers of evil and which, according to Aulén, reflected the beliefs of...
Overturning a popular view of the atonement Was Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulén's *Christus Victor* view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a ransom paid to the powers of evil and which, according to Aulén, reflected the beliefs of the early church. Aulén held that this ransom theory view dominated until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution. In *Suffering, Not Power,* Benjamin Wheaton challenges this common narrative that Christ's work of atonement was reframed by Anselm, showing that sacrificial and substitutionary language was common well before Anselm's *Cur Deus Homo*. Wheaton displays this through a careful analysis of three medieval theologians whose writings on the atonement are commonly overlooked: Caesarius of Arles, Haimo of Auxerre, and Dante Alighieri. These figures come from different times and contexts and wrote in different genres, but each spoke of Christ's death as a sacrifice of expiation and propitiation made by God to God. Let history speak for itself, read the evidence, and reconsider the church's belief in Christ's substitutionary death for sinners.
Suffering, Not Power: Atonement in the Middle Ages (Guide To Reading Biblical Hebrew Series)$49.99
Koorong code617067
ISBN9781683595991
Pages232
PublisherBaker Academic
Publication date01 June 2022
Dimensions15 x 141 x 218mm
Weight0.75kg
DeliveryOrder today for it to arrive in 6-8 weeks
Returns
Enjoy peace of mind with our 60-day hassle-free returns, whether you shop online or in store.