A bold reassessment of John’s Gospel and its relationship to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke Generations ago in biblical studies, it was taken for granted that John wrote with full knowledge of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. But this consensus was overturned in the 1930s and since then, there...
A bold reassessment of John’s Gospel and its relationship to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke
Generations ago in biblical studies, it was taken for granted that John wrote with full knowledge of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. But this consensus was overturned in the 1930s and since then, there has been no agreement on the issue. Today many scholars view the problem as unsolvable or impossibly complex. Mark Goodacre, however, takes a different view. In his galvanizing new book, Goodacre synthesizes long-neglected data with newer perspectives to make a strong case for John’s familiarity with all three Synoptic Gospels.
Writing in a clear and accessible style, Goodacre takes a systematic, step by step approach to showing that John knew and used the narratives of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Goodacre identifies key points of agreement that range from diagnostic shards to shared structures. He also analyzes key differences; in his telling, John dramatically transforms the Synoptics and develops their Christology while adding a beloved disciple of Jesus, who is himself a Synoptic character. To make his argument accessible to a broad audience, Goodacre minimizes the use of scholarly citations and translates all Greek words. Just as importantly, he illustrates his claims with clear, simple charts so that readers can see for themselves the evidence that John knew and used the Synoptics.
The Fourth Synoptic Gospel is sure to spark lively discussions among biblical scholars. Given that John’s relationship to the Synoptics is a fundamental issue in New Testament studies, Goodacre’s book is also a must read for students and professors alike.
A bold reassessment of John’s Gospel and its relationship to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke Generations ago in biblical studies, it was taken for granted that John wrote with full knowledge of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. But this consensus was overturned in the 1930s and since then, there...
A bold reassessment of John’s Gospel and its relationship to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke
Generations ago in biblical studies, it was taken for granted that John wrote with full knowledge of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. But this consensus was overturned in the 1930s and since then, there has been no agreement on the issue. Today many scholars view the problem as unsolvable or impossibly complex. Mark Goodacre, however, takes a different view. In his galvanizing new book, Goodacre synthesizes long-neglected data with newer perspectives to make a strong case for John’s familiarity with all three Synoptic Gospels.
Writing in a clear and accessible style, Goodacre takes a systematic, step by step approach to showing that John knew and used the narratives of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Goodacre identifies key points of agreement that range from diagnostic shards to shared structures. He also analyzes key differences; in his telling, John dramatically transforms the Synoptics and develops their Christology while adding a beloved disciple of Jesus, who is himself a Synoptic character. To make his argument accessible to a broad audience, Goodacre minimizes the use of scholarly citations and translates all Greek words. Just as importantly, he illustrates his claims with clear, simple charts so that readers can see for themselves the evidence that John knew and used the Synoptics.
The Fourth Synoptic Gospel is sure to spark lively discussions among biblical scholars. Given that John’s relationship to the Synoptics is a fundamental issue in New Testament studies, Goodacre’s book is also a must read for students and professors alike.
The Fourth Synoptic Gospel: John's Knowledge of Matthew, Mark, and Luke$44.99
Are academic books allowed to be this much fun to read?
With the vast volume of literature that any PhD candidate needs to absorb, one often feels saturated beyond capacity, entirely maxxed out. Defying my expectations this work, which helped to plug a very specific hole in my own research, was a most welcome read.
Academically rigorous in prosecuting his case - in many instances doing comparisons of word strings in the Greek and analysing word counts of verbatim overlaps that are distinctive to a particular account from among the Synoptics - Goodacre has nevertheless written in an engaging and accessible way. He has presented a defense of the claim that the author of the Fourth Gospel was not only aware of each of the synoptic accounts (not just of a single, source tradition) but that this awareness enabled him to be very selective about his own emphases in the presentation of his own Gospel account, and to enrich rather than parrot what each Synoptic Gospel provides. I am thoroughly enjoying working with his chapter on the Beloved Disciple in dialogue with Richard Bauckham's "The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple" - he makes some strong counter arguments against Bauckham's claim that the internal testimony of the Gospel According to John categorically excludes identification of John as the younger son of Zebedee.
I purchased the book at around 3pm and found when I looked at my watch a little after 8pm that evening only to realize I had only one chapter remaining. . . you don't expect to find this sort of "edge of seat" stuff…